Rep. Ocasio-Cortez On The Democratic Party, Green New Deal, 2020 Candidates | MTP Daily | MSNBC


ARGUABLY ALL COME BACK TO THE SAME STRUGGLE. SAME STRUGGLE. HITTING THE OLD GUARD AGAINST HITTING THE OLD GUARD AGAINST THEIR YOUNG RISING SCARS. THEIR YOUNG RISING SCARS. JOINING ME NOW TODAY IS JOINING ME NOW TODAY IS ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ. SOME OF THESE TENSIONS, WHAT IS SOME OF THESE TENSIONS, WHAT IS HAPPENING IN VIRGINIA, WHAT I HAPPENING IN VIRGINIA, WHAT I WE’RE SEEING WITH THE BACK AND WE’RE SEEING WITH THE BACK AND FORTH FRANKLY WITH WHAT YOU’RE FORTH FRANKLY WITH WHAT YOU’RE TRYING TO DO WITH CLIMATE TRYING TO DO WITH CLIMATE CHANGE, HOW MUCH OF THIS, DO YOU CHANGE, HOW MUCH OF THIS, DO YOU THINK IS GENERATIONAL OR SIDEI THINK IS GENERATIONAL OR SIDEI OR IDOELOGICAL. OR IDOELOGICAL.>>I DON’T THINK THE EMERGENCY>>I DON’T THINK THE EMERGENCY AROUND CLIMATE CHANGE, ECONOMIC AROUND CLIMATE CHANGE, ECONOMIC JUSTICE, IS JUST A YOUNG PEOPLE JUSTICE, IS JUST A YOUNG PEOPLE THING, BUT I BELIEVE THAT LIKE THING, BUT I BELIEVE THAT LIKE ALL BIG MOVEMENTS, THEY’RE ALL BIG MOVEMENTS, THEY’RE REALLY ACCELERATING THE TIME REALLY ACCELERATING THE TIME LINES TO REACH OUR GOALS. LINES TO REACH OUR GOALS.>>WE DON’T HAVE SOMEONE TO SAY>>WE DON’T HAVE SOMEONE TO SAY THIS IS A FIREABLE OFFENSE. THIS IS A FIREABLE OFFENSE. THIS IS SUCH AN IMPORTANT THIS IS SUCH AN IMPORTANT QUESTION. QUESTION. IT IS NOT JUST ABOUT WHO DID IT IS NOT JUST ABOUT WHO DID WHAT, BUT IT IS ABOUT HOW OUR WHAT, BUT IT IS ABOUT HOW OUR LEADERSHIP REALLY DEALS WITH THE LEADERSHIP REALLY DEALS WITH THE THINGS THEY HAVE DONE. THINGS THEY HAVE DONE. I THINK WHEN WE SEE A CRISIS OF I THINK WHEN WE SEE A CRISIS OF CONFIDENCE WITH SOME OF THE CONFIDENCE WITH SOME OF THE FOLKS IN VIRGINIA, IT IS THE WAY FOLKS IN VIRGINIA, IT IS THE WAY THEY ARE HANDLING THESE ISSUES. THEY ARE HANDLING THESE ISSUES. IT IS ARE WE USING THIS AS A IT IS ARE WE USING THIS AS A MOMENT TO MODEL WHAT RACE LOOKS MOMENT TO MODEL WHAT RACE LOOKS LIKE, AND IF YOU ARE SQUANDERING LIKE, AND IF YOU ARE SQUANDERING THAT, THAT, THAT. THAT.>>GOVERNOR NORTHAM SAME I>>GOVERNOR NORTHAM SAME I SHOULD STAY IN OFFICE. SHOULD STAY IN OFFICE.>>IF THAT WERE TRUE, HE WOULD>>IF THAT WERE TRUE, HE WOULD HAVE USED THIS MOMENT TO DO THIS HAVE USED THIS MOMENT TO DO THIS AND YOU MIGHT HAVE SAIDLY GIVE AND YOU MIGHT HAVE SAIDLY GIVE YOU A CHANCE TO STAY. YOU A CHANCE TO STAY.>>WITH HIM, WHAT I WILL SAY IS>>WITH HIM, WHAT I WILL SAY IS THAT THE DEGREE OF THE PHOTOS, THAT THE DEGREE OF THE PHOTOS, TO THAT EXTENT, IN HIS SPECIFIC TO THAT EXTENT, IN HIS SPECIFIC SITUATION, I DON’T THINK THERE SITUATION, I DON’T THINK THERE WAS A WAY OUT OF IT. WAS A WAY OUT OF IT. IN GENERAL IF THERE WAS AN IN GENERAL IF THERE WAS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL THAT WAS IN ELECTED OFFICIAL THAT WAS IN SOME DEGREE — ANOTHER PERSON SOME DEGREE — ANOTHER PERSON WHO PROACTIVELY MADE A STATEMENT WHO PROACTIVELY MADE A STATEMENT THAT SAID HEY WHEN I WAS 19 I THAT SAID HEY WHEN I WAS 19 I HAD A MISTAKEN HALLOWEEN HAD A MISTAKEN HALLOWEEN COSTUME, HERE IS WHAT I LEARNED COSTUME, HERE IS WHAT I LEARNED ABOUT IT. ABOUT IT.>>HOW YOU MODEL CLAIFR, AND IF>>HOW YOU MODEL CLAIFR, AND IF YOU DON’T THERE IS NO ROOM TO YOU DON’T THERE IS NO ROOM TO LEAD, SHE LEVER A LIED ACT LEAD, SHE LEVER A LIED ACT ANYTHING, BUT SHE HAS NOT GIVEN ANYTHING, BUT SHE HAS NOT GIVEN US THE FULLEST ANSWER YET. US THE FULLEST ANSWER YET. WHAT DO YOU THINK SHE SHOULD DO? WHAT DO YOU THINK SHE SHOULD DO?>>I THINK THERE IS WHO WAYS TO>>I THINK THERE IS WHO WAYS TO TALK ABOUT IT, AND AGAIN WE CAN TALK ABOUT IT, AND AGAIN WE CAN USE AND STILL HAVE AN USE AND STILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY, I THINK HERE IN OPPORTUNITY, I THINK HERE IN THIS SITUATION, I THINK THERE IS THIS SITUATION, I THINK THERE IS STILL AN OPPORTUNITY TO MODEL STILL AN OPPORTUNITY TO MODEL THE CORRECT WAY TO NAVIGATE WHAT THE CORRECT WAY TO NAVIGATE WHAT THESE WATERS LOOK LIKE. THESE WATERS LOOK LIKE. FOR EXAMPLE, I’M LATINA. FOR EXAMPLE, I’M LATINA. AND LATINO AMERICANS HAVE AN AND LATINO AMERICANS HAVE AN INTERESTING IDENTITY. INTERESTING IDENTITY. ESPECIALLY FOR ME, MY IDENTITY ESPECIALLY FOR ME, MY IDENTITY IS THE DESCENDENT OF MANY IS THE DESCENDENT OF MANY DIFFERENT IDENTITIES. DIFFERENT IDENTITIES. I SAM THE DESCENDENT OF SPANISH I SAM THE DESCENDENT OF SPANISH COLONIZERS. COLONIZERS. THAT DOESN’T MEAN THAT I’M BLACK THAT DOESN’T MEAN THAT I’M BLACK OR NATIVE. OR NATIVE. IT MEANS THAT I CAN USE THAT, I IT MEANS THAT I CAN USE THAT, I CAN TELL THE STORY OF MY CAN TELL THE STORY OF MY ANCESTORS THAT DOESN’T MEAN THAT ANCESTORS THAT DOESN’T MEAN THAT I AM THAT. I AM THAT. SO I THINK IN TERMS OF HOW WE SO I THINK IN TERMS OF HOW WE NAVIGATE THAT, I LOOK FORWARD TO NAVIGATE THAT, I LOOK FORWARD TO HER MODELLING A PROCESS. HER MODELLING A PROCESS.>>HAS IT SHAKEN ANY CONCERN OF>>HAS IT SHAKEN ANY CONCERN OF HER BEING A NOMINEE FOR THE HER BEING A NOMINEE FOR THE PARTY? PARTY?>>I THINK THEY ALL HAVE TIME.>>I THINK THEY ALL HAVE TIME.>>WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING FOR WHEN>>WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING FOR WHEN IT COMES TO THIS? IT COMES TO THIS? EVERYONE THAT HAS ANNOUNCED EVERYONE THAT HAS ANNOUNCED RUNNING HAS ENDORSED A DEAL. RUNNING HAS ENDORSED A DEAL. LET’S BE FRANK, YOU GREETED A LET’S BE FRANK, YOU GREETED A POLITICAL MOVEMENT, WHAT DO YOU POLITICAL MOVEMENT, WHAT DO YOU LOOK FOR IN A PRESIDENTIAL LOOK FOR IN A PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE THIS YEAR. NOMINEE THIS YEAR.>>FIRST, I DON’T THINK I>>FIRST, I DON’T THINK I CREATED A POLITICAL MOOUMT, I CREATED A POLITICAL MOOUMT, I THINK I AM PART OF ONE, BUT I THINK I AM PART OF ONE, BUT I THINK IN TERMS OF WHAT I LOOK THINK IN TERMS OF WHAT I LOOK FOR. FOR. I THINK IT IS THE UNDERSTANDING I THINK IT IS THE UNDERSTANDING OF THIS MOMENT THAT WE’RE IN OF THIS MOMENT THAT WE’RE IN RIGHT NOW AND THE ABILITY TO RIGHT NOW AND THE ABILITY TO ARTICULATE IT. ARTICULATE IT. I DON’T THINK A 2020 NOMINEE CAN I DON’T THINK A 2020 NOMINEE CAN AFFORD TO BE BAD ON ISSUES OF AFFORD TO BE BAD ON ISSUES OF RACE. RACE. I DON’T THINK THEY CAN AFFORD TO I DON’T THINK THEY CAN AFFORD TO BE BAD ON ISSUES OF ECONOMIC BE BAD ON ISSUES OF ECONOMIC JUSTICE EITHER. JUSTICE EITHER.>>WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THINGS>>WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THINGS LIKE THE ROLE OF THE LABOR LIKE THE ROLE OF THE LABOR BLOOUSMT. BLOOUSMT. WHEN IT IS WAGES OR UNION JOBS. WHEN IT IS WAGES OR UNION JOBS. THAT IS WHAT WE’RE FIGHTING FOR. THAT IS WHAT WE’RE FIGHTING FOR.>>SO YOU SAID THAT ON THE>>SO YOU SAID THAT ON THE ISSUES OF RACE, I THINK THOSE ISSUES OF RACE, I THINK THOSE YOU WOULD ASSUME THAT YOU COULD YOU WOULD ASSUME THAT YOU COULD NOT GET TRACTION ON THAT. NOT GET TRACTION ON THAT. DO YOU HAVE TO SAY YOU’LL DO IT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY YOU’LL DO IT OR IS BEING ASPIRING TO IT IN OR IS BEING ASPIRING TO IT IN THE FUTURE ENOUGH FOR YOU? THE FUTURE ENOUGH FOR YOU?>>.>>.>>I THINK THAT WE NEED>>I THINK THAT WE NEED COMMITMENTS WITH TEETH. COMMITMENTS WITH TEETH. I DON’T WANT TO BE PLACATED. I DON’T WANT TO BE PLACATED.>>WHAT IS THE DEFINITION.>>WHAT IS THE DEFINITION. THEY LOVE MEDICARE FOR ALL, BUT THEY LOVE MEDICARE FOR ALL, BUT THEY SAY IT IS NOT REALISTIC. THEY SAY IT IS NOT REALISTIC. IS THAT A NONSTARTER FOR YOU? IS THAT A NONSTARTER FOR YOU?>>FOR ME I REJECT THAT>>FOR ME I REJECT THAT OUTRIGHT. OUTRIGHT. I REJECT THE RATIONAL OF SAYING I REJECT THE RATIONAL OF SAYING ADOPTING THE SAME OR SIMILAR ADOPTING THE SAME OR SIMILAR INSURANCE MODELS IS UNREALISTIC. INSURANCE MODELS IS UNREALISTIC. I REJECT THAT. I REJECT THAT. I REJECT THE IDEA THAT SINGLE I REJECT THE IDEA THAT SINGLE PAYER IS IMPOSSIBLE. PAYER IS IMPOSSIBLE. I REJECT THE EYED THAT UNIVERSAL I REJECT THE EYED THAT UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE IS POSSIBLE. HEALTH CARE IS POSSIBLE. WHEN I TALK ABOUT WHAT I WANT IN WHEN I TALK ABOUT WHAT I WANT IN A 2020 CANDIDATE, I WANT A A 2020 CANDIDATE, I WANT A CANDIDATE THAT SAYS WE CAN DO CANDIDATE THAT SAYS WE CAN DO THESE THINGS, WE CAN BE THESE THINGS, WE CAN BE AUDACIOUS. AUDACIOUS. TO OVERCOME THIS MOVEMENT WE TO OVERCOME THIS MOVEMENT WE NEED TO RETURN TO OUR FDR ROOTS. NEED TO RETURN TO OUR FDR ROOTS.>>ONE THING THAT FDR HAD, HE>>ONE THING THAT FDR HAD, HE SAID SHE HAS THE GREAT NEW DEAL, SAID SHE HAS THE GREAT NEW DEAL, HE SAID FDR HAD A MASSIVE HE SAID FDR HAD A MASSIVE MAJORITY WHEN HE WENT TO PUSH MAJORITY WHEN HE WENT TO PUSH HIS DEAL THROUGH. HIS DEAL THROUGH. YOU DON’T HAVE A MASSIVE YOU DON’T HAVE A MASSIVE MAJORITY. MAJORITY. YOU DON’T HAVE MAJORITY AT ALL YOU DON’T HAVE MAJORITY AT ALL ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CAPITAL. CAPITAL. SO HOW DO YOU DO IT? SO HOW DO YOU DO IT?>>SO THIS IS A BIG PART OF WHEN>>SO THIS IS A BIG PART OF WHEN YOU BREAK DOWN OUR STRATEGY ON YOU BREAK DOWN OUR STRATEGY ON THE NEW DEAL. THE NEW DEAL. WHEN YOU GO BACK TO OUR REQUESTS WHEN YOU GO BACK TO OUR REQUESTS IN THE FALL, WE SPOKE ABOUT THE IN THE FALL, WE SPOKE ABOUT THE NEED TO DRAFT A BLUE BRING BY NEED TO DRAFT A BLUE BRING BY 2020. 2020. IT IS SO THAT BY 2020 WE CAN GET IT IS SO THAT BY 2020 WE CAN GET ALL OF THOSE CHESS PIECES IN ALL OF THOSE CHESS PIECES IN ORDER. ORDER. WE CAN GET A MAJORITY IN THE WE CAN GET A MAJORITY IN THE HOUSE, THE SENATE, WE CAN HOUSE, THE SENATE, WE CAN CAPTURE THE PRESIDENCY AND GET CAPTURE THE PRESIDENCY AND GET THINGS DONE. THINGS DONE.>>JOE MANCHIN, WE USED THE WORD>>JOE MANCHIN, WE USED THE WORD COAL NINE TIMES ON TUESDAY, AND COAL NINE TIMES ON TUESDAY, AND AT THE END OF THE DAY, CHUCK AT THE END OF THE DAY, CHUCK SCHUMER HE WANTS TO FIND A 51 SCHUMER HE WANTS TO FIND A 51 SENATORS. SENATORS.>>I THINK WHEN IT COMES TO>>I THINK WHEN IT COMES TO MAKING THE COMPROMISES IT’S MAKING THE COMPROMISES IT’S ABOUT THE LANDSCAPE WHEN WE GET ABOUT THE LANDSCAPE WHEN WE GET THERE. THERE. THERE ARE SOME THAT I THINK ARE THERE ARE SOME THAT I THINK ARE ON THE TABLE IF WE HAVE JUST 51, ON THE TABLE IF WE HAVE JUST 51, BUT I THINK SOME OF THOSE ARE BUT I THINK SOME OF THOSE ARE OFF OF THE STABLE IF WE HAVE 60. OFF OF THE STABLE IF WE HAVE 60. I CAN’T SPECULATE TO WHAT IT I CAN’T SPECULATE TO WHAT IT WOULD BE FOR ANY VARIABLE MAKEUP WOULD BE FOR ANY VARIABLE MAKEUP IN 2020, BUT WE CAN START OUR IN 2020, BUT WE CAN START OUR ORGANIZE NOOIGZ AND BEING AS ORGANIZE NOOIGZ AND BEING AS AGGRESSIVE AS POSSIBLE. AGGRESSIVE AS POSSIBLE.>>WHAT IS THE BEST CASE FOR CON>>WHAT IS THE BEST CASE FOR CON SERVETIVE LEADERS, THEY SEE WHAT SERVETIVE LEADERS, THEY SEE WHAT HAPPENED IN FRANCE AND IT SEEMS HAPPENED IN FRANCE AND IT SEEMS LIKE IT IMPACTS THE LOWER TO LIKE IT IMPACTS THE LOWER TO MIDDLE LOWER CLASS MORE. MIDDLE LOWER CLASS MORE. THAT IT WILL JUST TRICKLE DOWN THAT IT WILL JUST TRICKLE DOWN TO THE WORKING LASS. TO THE WORKING LASS.>>IT HAS IN FRANCE BECAUSE WE>>IT HAS IN FRANCE BECAUSE WE ALLOWED THEM TO TAKE OVER WHO ALLOWED THEM TO TAKE OVER WHO BEARS THE BURDEN FOR CARBON BEARS THE BURDEN FOR CARBON TAXES. TAXES. WHEN WE WORK AS A PROGRESSIVE WHEN WE WORK AS A PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENT HERE, IT NEEDS TO BE MOVEMENT HERE, IT NEEDS TO BE LEAD BY EVERY DAY PEOPLE, BY LEAD BY EVERY DAY PEOPLE, BY WORKERS, IT NEEDS TO BE LEAD BY WORKERS, IT NEEDS TO BE LEAD BY FRONT LINE COMMUNITIES. FRONT LINE COMMUNITIES. IF WE DON’T DO THAT THAT IS WHAT IF WE DON’T DO THAT THAT IS WHAT HAPPENS. HAPPENS. AND BY THE WAY, WHEN YOU LOOK AT AND BY THE WAY, WHEN YOU LOOK AT WHO IS ACTUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR WHO IS ACTUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAJORITY OF CARBON EMISSIONS THE MAJORITY OF CARBON EMISSIONS EMISSIONS, IT IS THE TOP TEN EMISSIONS, IT IS THE TOP TEN CORPORATIONS IN THE WORLD THAT CORPORATIONS IN THE WORLD THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR AN ENORMOUS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF OUR CARBON OUTPUT. AMOUNT OF OUR CARBON OUTPUT. IT SHOULD NOT BE MIDDLE CLASS IT SHOULD NOT BE MIDDLE CLASS AMERICANS AND EVERY DAY PEOPLE AMERICANS AND EVERY DAY PEOPLE THAT BEAR THAT BURDEN AND IT THAT BEAR THAT BURDEN AND IT SHOULD NOT BE A GAS TAX AT THE SHOULD NOT BE A GAS TAX AT THE PUMP. PUMP. IT SHOULD BE THE CORPORATIONS IT SHOULD BE THE CORPORATIONS RESPONSIBLE FOR SOILING — RESPONSIBLE FOR SOILING — RATHER FOR POLLUTING OUR WATER RATHER FOR POLLUTING OUR WATER AND AIR. AND AIR.>>HOW DO YOU ENVISION VIE>>HOW DO YOU ENVISION VIE FANSING THIS. FANSING THIS. HOW DO YOU INVISION VIE FANSING HOW DO YOU INVISION VIE FANSING THIS? THIS?>>THERE IS A COUPLE THICKS.>>THERE IS A COUPLE THICKS. ONE IS THAT I THINK ONE WAY THAT ONE IS THAT I THINK ONE WAY THAT THE THEY TRY TO MISCHARACTERIZE THE THEY TRY TO MISCHARACTERIZE WHAT WE’RE DOING IS LIKE IT IS A WHAT WE’RE DOING IS LIKE IT IS A MASSIVE GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER. MASSIVE GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER. WHAT WE’RE TRYING TO DO, IT’S WHAT WE’RE TRYING TO DO, IT’S OBVIOUSLY NOT THAT BECAUSE WHAT OBVIOUSLY NOT THAT BECAUSE WHAT WE’RE TRYING TO DO IS RELEASE WE’RE TRYING TO DO IS RELEASE THE INVESTMENTS FROM THE FEDERAL THE INVESTMENTS FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO MOBILIZE THOSE GOVERNMENT TO MOBILIZE THOSE RESOURCES ACROSS THE COUNTRY. RESOURCES ACROSS THE COUNTRY. HOW DO WE GET THERE? HOW DO WE GET THERE? IT CAN COME ACROSS A WIDE RANGE IT CAN COME ACROSS A WIDE RANGE OF THINGS. OF THINGS. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY STYLE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY STYLE PUBLIC PROGRAMS, PUBLIC PRIVATE PUBLIC PROGRAMS, PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS, IT CAN WORK ON A PARTNERSHIPS, IT CAN WORK ON A MUNICIPAL LEVEL. MUNICIPAL LEVEL. IT’S NOT AS THOUGH THE FEDERAL IT’S NOT AS THOUGH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WILL WAVE AND WAND GOVERNMENT WILL WAVE AND WAND AND SAY WE’RE GOING TO DO IT AND SAY WE’RE GOING TO DO IT OURSELVES. OURSELVES. SECONDLY I THINK A BIG ISSUE, SECONDLY I THINK A BIG ISSUE, TOO, IS THAT WE HAVE TO REALLY TOO, IS THAT WE HAVE TO REALLY ADDRESS THE FACT THAT THERE HAS ADDRESS THE FACT THAT THERE HAS BEEN A BROKEN METAPHOR OF THE BEEN A BROKEN METAPHOR OF THE GOVERNMENT AS THIS ONE IN AND GOVERNMENT AS THIS ONE IN AND ONE OUT PIGGY BANK THAT ONE OUT PIGGY BANK THAT REPUBLICANS LIKE TO SAY APPLIES REPUBLICANS LIKE TO SAY APPLIES TO DEMOCRATIC PROGRAMS, BUT WHEN TO DEMOCRATIC PROGRAMS, BUT WHEN IT IS THEIR TURN AT THE HELM, IT IS THEIR TURN AT THE HELM, THEY JUST CUT WHATEVER CHECK THEY JUST CUT WHATEVER CHECK THEY WANT TO CUT WHICH IS WHAT THEY WANT TO CUT WHICH IS WHAT THEY DID WITH THE TAX CUT BILL, THEY DID WITH THE TAX CUT BILL, BUT THE TAX CUT BILL THEY LIED BUT THE TAX CUT BILL THEY LIED ABOUT IT. ABOUT IT. WE KNOW FOR EVERY DOLLAR YOU CUT WE KNOW FOR EVERY DOLLAR YOU CUT IN TAXES YOU GET JUST A COUPLE IN TAXES YOU GET JUST A COUPLE CENTS BACK. CENTS BACK. BUT FOR EVERY DOLLAR YOU INVEST BUT FOR EVERY DOLLAR YOU INVEST IN INFRASTRUCTURE IN BUILDING IN IN INFRASTRUCTURE IN BUILDING IN JOBS YOU GET MORE THAN A DOLLAR JOBS YOU GET MORE THAN A DOLLAR BACK. BACK.>>A LITTLE PARTY POLITICS>>A LITTLE PARTY POLITICS QUESTION I HAVE TO ASK YOU. QUESTION I HAVE TO ASK YOU. YOU’RE NOT — YOU ROLLED THIS YOU’RE NOT — YOU ROLLED THIS OUT TODAY WITH SENATOR MARKIE ON OUT TODAY WITH SENATOR MARKIE ON THIS. THIS. YOU WEREN’T ON THE CLIMATE YOU WEREN’T ON THE CLIMATE CHANGE YOU SAID YOU WERE INVITED CHANGE YOU SAID YOU WERE INVITED TO BE ON IT AND YOU DIDN’T. TO BE ON IT AND YOU DIDN’T.>>I DO WANT TO BE ON IT, BUT –>>I DO WANT TO BE ON IT, BUT –>>THEN WHY AREN’T YOU?>>THEN WHY AREN’T YOU? I’M SORRY, BUT IT MAKES SENSE TO I’M SORRY, BUT IT MAKES SENSE TO ME TO PUT YOU ON IT. ME TO PUT YOU ON IT.>>ABSOLUTELY.>>ABSOLUTELY. A LOT OF IT FRANKLY IS TIMING A LOT OF IT FRANKLY IS TIMING AND LOGISTICS. AND LOGISTICS. WE ANNOUNCED OUR COMMITTEE WE ANNOUNCED OUR COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS, I DIDN’T KNOW IF I ASSIGNMENTS, I DIDN’T KNOW IF I WOULD BE ASKED OR SELECTED FOR WOULD BE ASKED OR SELECTED FOR THE SELECT COMMITTEE AT THAT THE SELECT COMMITTEE AT THAT TIME. TIME. SO I WANTED TO MAXIMIZE MY SO I WANTED TO MAXIMIZE MY STANDING COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS. STANDING COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS. SO I WAS ABLE TO GET ON SO I WAS ABLE TO GET ON FINANCIAL SERVICES WHICH IS ONE FINANCIAL SERVICES WHICH IS ONE OF A HANDFUL OF EXCLUSIVE OF A HANDFUL OF EXCLUSIVE COMMITTEES, AND I’M ON THE COMMITTEES, AND I’M ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL SUB COMMITTEE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SUB COMMITTEE OF OVERSIGHT, WHICH IS ALSO A VERY OVERSIGHT, WHICH IS ALSO A VERY HIGH PROFILE COMMITTEE. HIGH PROFILE COMMITTEE. AND SO WITH THAT, I’M ALSO ON AND SO WITH THAT, I’M ALSO ON FOUR SUB COMMITTEES, SO WHEN I FOUR SUB COMMITTEES, SO WHEN I GOT THE CALL RECENTLY TO GET ON GOT THE CALL RECENTLY TO GET ON THE SELECT COMMITTEE, I DIDN’T THE SELECT COMMITTEE, I DIDN’T FEEL LIKE I WOULD BE ABLE TO DO FEEL LIKE I WOULD BE ABLE TO DO IT JUSTICE, BUT AN AMAZING IT JUSTICE, BUT AN AMAZING CLIMATE ACTIVIST IS ON IT. CLIMATE ACTIVIST IS ON IT.>>YOU DON’T FEEL LIKE IT IS A>>YOU DON’T FEEL LIKE IT IS A SNUB AT ALL? SNUB AT ALL?>>I TRULY DO NOT.>>I TRULY DO NOT. THE SPEAKER WAS GRACIOUS ENOUGH THE SPEAKER WAS GRACIOUS ENOUGH TO INVITE ME ON IT, I THINK FOR TO INVITE ME ON IT, I THINK FOR ME IT WAS — ME IT WAS –>>WOULD YOU HAVE HAD TO GIVE UP>>WOULD YOU HAVE HAD TO GIVE UP SOMETHING TO GET ON IT? SOMETHING TO GET ON IT? WAS THAT THE DEAL? WAS THAT THE DEAL?>>NO.>>NO.>>WOULD YOU HAVE TO GIVE UP>>WOULD YOU HAVE TO GIVE UP FINANCIAL SERVICES TO DO THIS? FINANCIAL SERVICES TO DO THIS?>>I WOULD HAVE TO GIVE UP DOING>>I WOULD HAVE TO GIVE UP DOING MY JOB WELL IS HOW I FEEL, AND I MY JOB WELL IS HOW I FEEL, AND I DON’T WANT TO GIVE THAT UP. DON’T WANT TO GIVE THAT UP.>>HOW COMMITTED IS SPEAKER>>HOW COMMITTED IS SPEAKER PELOSI TO THE GREEN NEW DEAL. PELOSI TO THE GREEN NEW DEAL. SOME PEOPLE THOUGHT SHE WAS SOME PEOPLE THOUGHT SHE WAS BEING DISMISSIVE, YOU DID NOT BEING DISMISSIVE, YOU DID NOT TAKE IT AS DISMISSIVE. TAKE IT AS DISMISSIVE. DO YOU THINK THAT SHE IS BOUGHT? DO YOU THINK THAT SHE IS BOUGHT? ? ?>>FOR ME WHAT I INTRODUCED>>FOR ME WHAT I INTRODUCED TODAY WAS A RESOLUTION, NOT A TODAY WAS A RESOLUTION, NOT A BILL. BILL. A RESOLUTION JUST HAS TO PASS A RESOLUTION JUST HAS TO PASS THE HOUSE AND IT IS NOT A PLAN, THE HOUSE AND IT IS NOT A PLAN, IT IS THE SCOPE OF THE PLAN, I IT IS THE SCOPE OF THE PLAN, I THINK IN TERMS OF THE SCOPE OF THINK IN TERMS OF THE SCOPE OF THE PLAN, I THINK WE WILL GET THE PLAN, I THINK WE WILL GET THERE. THERE. WE LAUNCHED WITH 60 COSPONSORS WE LAUNCHED WITH 60 COSPONSORS IN THE HOUSE. IN THE HOUSE. THAT IS PRETTY CRAZY. THAT IS PRETTY CRAZY. WE WERE ABLE TO LAUNCH ON DAY WE WERE ABLE TO LAUNCH ON DAY ONE WITH 60 COSPONSORS. ONE WITH 60 COSPONSORS. WE HAVE MORE ROLLING IN AND WE WE HAVE MORE ROLLING IN AND WE MAY GET A MAJORITY OF THE CAUCUS MAY GET A MAJORITY OF THE CAUCUS IN THERE. IN THERE. THE PRESIDENT SPENT A LOT OF THE PRESIDENT SPENT A LOT OF TIME ON SOCIALISM AND TIME ON SOCIALISM AND SOCIALISTS. SOCIALISTS. IT WAS NOT TOO SURE IF IF WAS A IT WAS NOT TOO SURE IF IF WAS A DIG OR ENHANCEMENT. DIG OR ENHANCEMENT. CAN YOU BE A DEMOCRATIC CAN YOU BE A DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST AND A CAPITALIST? SOCIALIST AND A CAPITALIST?>>I THINK IT DEPENDS ON YOUR>>I THINK IT DEPENDS ON YOUR INTERPRETATION. INTERPRETATION. SOME SOCIALISTS WOULD SAY SOME SOCIALISTS WOULD SAY ABSOLUTELY NOT, OTHERS WOULD SAY ABSOLUTELY NOT, OTHERS WOULD SAY YOU KNOW I THINK IT IS POSSIBLE. YOU KNOW I THINK IT IS POSSIBLE.>>WHAT ARE YOU?>>WHAT ARE YOU?>>I THINK IT IS POSSIBLE.>>I THINK IT IS POSSIBLE.>>DO YOU THINK I’M A>>DO YOU THINK I’M A CAPITALIST, BUT — CAPITALIST, BUT –>>NO, I DON’T SAY THAT, I WOULD>>NO, I DON’T SAY THAT, I WOULD SAY THAT I BELIEVE IN A SAY THAT I BELIEVE IN A DEMOCRATIC ECONOMY, BUT — BUT DEMOCRATIC ECONOMY, BUT — BUT THE BUT IS THERE. THE BUT IS THERE. SO IF YOU’RE COMING FROM SO IF YOU’RE COMING FROM ELIZABETH WARREN’S PERSPECTIVE, ELIZABETH WARREN’S PERSPECTIVE, SHE SAYS I’M A CAPITALIST, BUT SHE SAYS I’M A CAPITALIST, BUT WE NEED HARD RULES FOR THE GAME. WE NEED HARD RULES FOR THE GAME. IF YOU SAY GOVERNMENT SHOULD SAY IF YOU SAY GOVERNMENT SHOULD SAY OUT OF X, WHAT DO THEY DO OUT OF X, WHAT DO THEY DO BETTER? BETTER?>>I THINK THERE IS A LOT OF>>I THINK THERE IS A LOT OF CONSUMER GOODS. CONSUMER GOODS. AND I THINK THERE IS A WAY TO AND I THINK THERE IS A WAY TO DELINEATE THAT JUST BECAUSE DELINEATE THAT JUST BECAUSE YOU’RE IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, YOU’RE IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, YOU CAN BE A DEMOCRATICALLY YOU CAN BE A DEMOCRATICALLY SOCIAL BUSINESS. SOCIAL BUSINESS. IT IS NOT ABOUT GOVERNMENT IT IS NOT ABOUT GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER, IT IS ABOUT HOW MUCH TAKEOVER, IT IS ABOUT HOW MUCH DO WORKERS HAVE A SAY IN YOUR DO WORKERS HAVE A SAY IN YOUR BUSINESS. BUSINESS. DO YOU HAVE WORKERS ON THE DO YOU HAVE WORKERS ON THE BOARD. BOARD. DO THEY ENJOY THE WEALTH THEY DO THEY ENJOY THE WEALTH THEY ARE CREATING? ARE CREATING? OR IS THE MA CHORTY OF THE — OR IS THE MA CHORTY OF THE — MAJORITY OF THE PROFITS GOING MAJORITY OF THE PROFITS GOING SOMEWHERE ELSE. SOMEWHERE ELSE. IT IS NOT THAT ONE SECTOR IS IT IS NOT THAT ONE SECTOR IS SOCIALISTS AND ONE IS NOT. SOCIALISTS AND ONE IS NOT. IT’S A MORE NUANCED IT’S A MORE NUANCED UNDERSTANDING OF HOW OUR ECONOMY UNDERSTANDING OF HOW OUR ECONOMY SHOULD WORK. SHOULD WORK.>>SOMEONE WITH AN INTERESTING>>SOMEONE WITH AN INTERESTING PERSPECTIVE ON THIS ISSUE WAS PERSPECTIVE ON THIS ISSUE WAS SENATE ER SENATE ER SENATOR CLAIRE McCASKILL SAYING SENATOR CLAIRE McCASKILL SAYING IT IS EASY TO BE A DEMOCRATIC IT IS EASY TO BE A DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST IN A BLUE DISTRICT SOCIALIST IN A BLUE DISTRICT LIKE YOURS. LIKE YOURS. HOW DO YOU SQUARE THAT WITH THE HOW DO YOU SQUARE THAT WITH THE ABILITY TO FIND A MAJORITY? ABILITY TO FIND A MAJORITY?>>I SQUARE IT WITH THE DIRECT>>I SQUARE IT WITH THE DIRECT EVIDENCE IN 2016 THAT THAT IS EVIDENCE IN 2016 THAT THAT IS NOT TRUE. NOT TRUE. NO MATTER HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT NO MATTER HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS HE RAN IN SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS HE RAN IN 2016 AS A DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, 2016 AS A DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, UNAPOLOGETIC UNAPOLOGETIC UNAPOLOGETICALLY. UNAPOLOGETICALLY.>>IN PRIMARIES, AMONG>>IN PRIMARIES, AMONG DEMOCRATS, BUT THOSE DEMOCRATS, BUT THOSE INDEPENDENTS, RIGHT? INDEPENDENTS, RIGHT?>>AND HE WINS INDENT.>>AND HE WINS INDENT. PEOPLE HAVE A MISTAKEN IDEA THAT PEOPLE HAVE A MISTAKEN IDEA THAT AMERICAN PICKS IS ON ONE LYNN AMERICAN PICKS IS ON ONE LYNN YARD LINE. YARD LINE. 40% OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC 40% OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IDENTIFIES AS INDEPENDENTS, THAT IDENTIFIES AS INDEPENDENTS, THAT DOESN’T MEAN WE’RE? DOESN’T MEAN WE’RE? THE MIDDLE, IT MEANS WE HATE THE MIDDLE, IT MEANS WE HATE THAT THING. THAT THING. SOME ARE FREAKING OUT ABOUT IT SOME ARE FREAKING OUT ABOUT IT BUT I’M COMING FROM SOMEONE THAT BUT I’M COMING FROM SOMEONE THAT SAYS MORE COMPETITION IS BETTER SAYS MORE COMPETITION IS BETTER NOT WORSE. NOT WORSE.>>FOUR OR FIVE I THINK THAT IS>>FOUR OR FIVE I THINK THAT IS FINE. FINE. I THINK THAT IS — IT SOUNDS I THINK THAT IS — IT SOUNDS LIKE THE TWO MAJOR PARTIES YOU LIKE THE TWO MAJOR PARTIES YOU THINK DON’T EVERYBODY THIS WELL. THINK DON’T EVERYBODY THIS WELL.>>I THINK THAT IS TOTALLY FINE>>I THINK THAT IS TOTALLY FINE TO SAY A TWO PARTY SYSTEM IN TO SAY A TWO PARTY SYSTEM IN THIS TIME OF GRIDLOCK IS A THIS TIME OF GRIDLOCK IS A DIFFICULT THING TO NAVIGATE. DIFFICULT THING TO NAVIGATE. AND IT IS — I THINK IT IS AND IT IS — I THINK IT IS VIABLE, IT IS A NORMAL THING TO VIABLE, IT IS A NORMAL THING TO SAY AFTER YEARS AND YEARS AND SAY AFTER YEARS AND YEARS AND DECADES OF GRIDLOCK WHERE THEY DECADES OF GRIDLOCK WHERE THEY SAY MAYBE SOMETHING HERE IS SAY MAYBE SOMETHING HERE IS FRULLY WRONG. FRULLY WRONG. IN TERMS OF THAT AS A IN TERMS OF THAT AS A CONVERSATION, I THINK THAT IS A CONVERSATION, I THINK THAT IS A FINE DEVGS TO HAVE. FINE DEVGS TO HAVE. I THINK THAT COMES DOWN TO I THINK THAT COMES DOWN TO STATES AND CITY MUNICIPALITYIESM STATES AND CITY MUNICIPALITYIESM>>ARE YOU STILL FEELING THE>>ARE YOU STILL FEELING THE BERN? BERN?>>I LOVE SENATOR SANDERS.>>I LOVE SENATOR SANDERS. I THINK HE IS GREAT. I THINK HE IS GREAT. I THINK IN TERMS OF AN I THINK IN TERMS OF AN ENDORSEMENT, I USUALLY SAY DON’T ENDORSEMENT, I USUALLY SAY DON’T ASK ME UNTIL THE DAY OF A ASK ME UNTIL THE DAY OF A PRIMARY. PRIMARY. I THINK THE IMPORTANT THING THAT I THINK THE IMPORTANT THING THAT WE IMMEDIATE TO UNDERSTAND IS I WE IMMEDIATE TO UNDERSTAND IS I HOPE WE USE THIS PRIMARY NOT AS HOPE WE USE THIS PRIMARY NOT AS A HORSE RACE AROUND A HORSE RACE AROUND PERSONALITIES, BUT AROUND OUR PERSONALITIES, BUT AROUND OUR VALUES. VALUES.>>DO YOU WANT IT TO BE ANNIZE>>DO YOU WANT IT TO BE ANNIZE LODGE LODGE — IDEOLOGICAL PARTY. — IDEOLOGICAL PARTY.>>I THINK THAT WE SHOULD NOT>>I THINK THAT WE SHOULD NOT SOLELY BASED ON WHAT WE THINK SOLELY BASED ON WHAT WE THINK WILL BE SUBJECT TO SCRUTINY FROM WILL BE SUBJECT TO SCRUTINY FROM THE OTHER PARTY. THE OTHER PARTY. I DON’T THINK THAT IS A WAY OF I DON’T THINK THAT IS A WAY OF DOING ANYTHING. DOING ANYTHING. THAT LEADS TO US GOVERNING FROM THAT LEADS TO US GOVERNING FROM FEAR, CASTING VOTES FROM FEAR, FEAR, CASTING VOTES FROM FEAR, AND I DON’T THINK THAT WE GET AND I DON’T THINK THAT WE GET ANYTHING DONE. ANYTHING DONE. I THINK THE STRONGEST POSITION I THINK THE STRONGEST POSITION IS TO KNOW OUR VALUES AND BE

100 thoughts on “Rep. Ocasio-Cortez On The Democratic Party, Green New Deal, 2020 Candidates | MTP Daily | MSNBC

  1. Love Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, She got a good head on her shoulders.

  2. The green new deal is just plain stupid.  First of all, it will scientifically do nothing to reduce the global temps.  We can turn off all production in the US but as long as the rest of the world is producing at its current level, there will be no change in anything.The green new deal is just another attempt of left wing progressive nutjobs to take control of America.

  3. The government is corrupt. So we should give them more control with the “green new deal” that will fix it. Omg, if any body really believes that is sadly mistaken. We need to get government out of health care and make lobbying illegal so that corporations aren’t controlling our elected officials/government

  4. @ 6:05 "So when we talk about the role of Labor movement.. union jobs.. good jobs".
    Same AOC blew 25K high-paying jobs for New York. Then again, New York and economically-ignorant Democrats: made-for-each-other.

  5. All you Socialists who feel that the U.S., Western culture, you is so wrong, so terrible, why don't you just pack up and move yourselves to a Socialistic county and hep them make it work? Why stay here and fleece us Patriotic Americans, and drag us into your nightmare, when there are Socialist nation's waiting to welcome you with open arms and put you to work?

  6. The concern is America wants to elect people that will only bring in revenue; not a representative figure that commits only to appreciation.

  7. Can you compare the speaking intelligence of this woman to our toddler trump who speaks like a 2nd grader at best?

  8. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 💕Godspeed AOC 💕 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
    This interview should be posted everywhere!

  9. AOC when you become president US send us your hated tippytop corporates.
    we Indians will send our poverty in exchange .

  10. WTH was this about? Bla bla bla bla… Sounded like a 7 year old trying to talk like an adult.

  11. Biden is already Mr. “No We Can’t” just like Hillary. Biden had to be forced to admit Hyde amendment is bad policy. He is a reactionary jerk.

  12. Socialism is not communism. I have lived in Sweden and Denmark which both have universal health care, (taxpayer paid) free education , and subsidized public transportation. You still buy your groceries and clothes, and cars. It's a normal capitalist society, they just take care of public health, education and transportation. I don't know any details of how they did it, The Danes are some of the happiest people I've ever met. I think it's partly because off their great beer and sense of humor!

  13. I remain so very Thankful for her voice, poise and intelligence.

  14. With 2020 close the Dems have 23 people running for president but almost none running for senate , so we're screwed in 2020 . The DNC works very hard to squash the most popular politition in America and in cooperation with the corperatly owned media still smear Bernie and will continue

  15. So glad black people are beginning to see Dems bringing in Latinos to stay in power . But nothing to bring them up.

  16. It is VERY refreshing to see a politician speak in plan English and question false assumptions peddled by corporate Democrats and Republicans. Go AOC! Capitalism only works if those who abuse the system also pay the price for that abuse. So far that is not happening. In fact the opposite is happening with complicated legislation being institutionalized corruption.

  17. Where exactly are we going to get the 60 to 90 TRILLION dollars this thing is going to cost? The Green New Deal is impossible to implement without racking up insane amounts of debt that we will never ever be able to pay off. AOC has no idea what she is doing. She didn't even understand that the 3 billion dollars "saved" by tanking the NYC Amazon deal and it's 25k jobs couldn't be reinvested because it was basically a 3 billion dollar discount. She is shockingly dumb for an economist.

  18. AOC very smart I think we will be seeing you around for a very long time. Always a pleasure to see you and hear about the corrections needed in government.

  19. More word salad…jibber jabber sautéed with wilted rotting lettuce.

  20. “Wow! ‘ALex’ Ocasio-Cortez, a PhD in her 1st shot at Politics!!! 😇😇😇😇😇

  21. She actually thinks about a response instead of answering with a question . How can you listen to her and think it’s bad. WTF is wrong with people. She is awesome. Bernie x AOC 2020. congress has literally done nothing for 20 plus years. All they do is fill their pockets. We need change now

  22. MSNBC, ABC, CBS ect…. pieces of MF!#&*##/!*&/" ….keep running your agenda with pieces of s*** like this one in Congress she's a plant we know she is just like the rest of them they don't belong up there but that's okay your crap is going to start some s*** before it's over with your pushing it down the people's throat and they don't want it any more and I'm one of them and when it breaks loose I will be right there looking for you !! you're not Americans your pieces of s*** !! TRUMP 20/20 !!

  23. FOX: 70% of the Americans support AOC's 70% tax cut for the rich 1%. Her program of healthcare, education, economic emancipation, workplace reform, stopping 'pay for play', stopping lobby (AIPAC) etc., popular in all the states, is spellbinding. In short she is the one who can drain the swamp and make MAGA. USA needs a leader for 2020, Americans have found her.

  24. You`ll have a problem is this woman wins, she`ll open flood gates for latinos to enter the US. Women in any government weakens it.

  25. AOC has refused to debate anyone from the right. she only goes to liberal balless stations that never challenge her ideas — because they are pointless.

  26. great fluff piece! please don't ask nay really hard questions… and NEVER… NEVER follow up when she seems confused!

  27. Green new deal sucks. Socialist govt takeover Ain't happening. You are a liar and fraud. Dems are frauds and liars just like the media.

  28. She is right about multiple parties unless real conservatives want to be labled racist xenophobic john birchers and dixiecrats. Parliamentary sytems work very well but they are in democracies. America's Oligarchy requires only winner and loser in a binary dysfunctional clusterfrack that preserves the chaos, violence, and unrest that is so profitable for media, security, arms, jails, and mortuary services. America can get to 4% growth if a civil war broke out.

  29. She won't debate anyone with s brain, that'll ask questions, she hasn't studied with her puppet masters,

  30. She represents herself.idiots like her put her their .nothing she says makes sense.

  31. Socialism has robbed the economic future of millennials. All of the programs have been based upon a Ponzi scheme from Social Security to Obamacare. The entire foundation of socialism is constructed on taking other people’s money. Naturally, they always point the finger at the rich. But the social programs are really based upon one generation paying for the previous. In Europe, they call them the “Lost Generation” because unemployment is running at 50-60% levels among the youth. If we simply add up what we have all paid into these programs with inflation over our lifetimes, whatever we eventually receive back is a fraction of the real wealth we contribute.
    The Ponzi scheme of socialism is coming to an end. It has wrongly deprived the lower class of investing, for the money taken from them for their future is restricted to government bonds. The rich get rich, not from wages, but from investments — the very thing governments deny the lower classes.

  32. My family and I with Ocasio- Cortez for 2020. She is beautiful intelligent and come with real solutions to the problems we confront in this time.

  33. So many tv news are systematic and don't say anything against them the 5% filthy reach people Alide with the government……….. AOC is the best Option for 2020.

  34. If you have to ask if you can be a socialist and a capitalists simultaneously, you don't know what a socialist is. I feel like Americans should go learn these terms before they have these discussions, the ones that are polar opposites and therefore, mutually exclusive are capitalism and communism. AOC has this on point and truly understands what socialism is.

  35. Needs to get out of politics. What a loser. Disgrace to our country.

  36. You grow girl I got your back keep doing the right thing and you're really going to go places

  37. Model behaviour facist Communist doublespeak for controlling your behaviour re education camp's for behaviour modification a commitment with teeth is her mantra she is a reprobate a disgusting piece of excrement.

  38. Rising star??? Young people's thing??? Open your mouth and you simply spews STUPIDITY!!! Your little girl voice fits your mindset!!! Your act is part of your parties PROBLEM!!!

  39. AOC is a latin American supremacist, several interviews revealing how superior she feels people of not white descent are.

  40. Her popularity is based on comedy, on the fact that shes to stupid to know when to shut her mouth,and how her unaccountability is her platform.good intertainment at a high cost to taxpayers.

  41. AOC, TELLS IT LIKE IT IS:
    POOR PEOPLE ARE FIRST.
    THE LESS FORTUNATE ARE
    FIRST. A 15 DOLLAR AN
    HOUR, LIVING WAGE IS
    FIRST. AND, THE ENVIRONMENT,
    AND CLIMATE CHANGE IS
    FIRST. VIVA! OAC! VIVA !!

  42. Zzz. My President trump ya tiene el medication plan under control. He just needs to do the final draft.

  43. Zzz. Puedes quedarte en este canal y hablar por ella. Me. Ámbito de canal!

  44. The word is pronounced imporTant. There’s a hard t in the middle you dullard

  45. My dear sister Alexandra ocasio Cortez God bless you for ever your American hero one love keep your head up 👍😘😍😍😍😍😘😘😘

  46. We love you so much and we support you untill the end of winning mucha garadsia

  47. This Puerturicanian woman is one stupid gal! Definitely not good for this country, and I believe she is a traitor.!

  48. Wow I lost brain cells when she talked about her identity and cultural appropriation.

  49. We are getting scammed by big pharma, Insurance companies, hospitals,doctors I went to emergency was there overnight all they did was hydrate me and charged $48,000.

  50. Shes smart. Smarter than trump buy far.ask Trump the exact same questions and all you'll get is him walking out and screaming fake news

  51. America is capitalist and socialist. The military is all socialist. Even has a single payer system.

  52. Original Author unknown "Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country" Words spoken never truer than today. Literally !

  53. Thanks to the Internet, it is possible for a populist to bypass traditional big donors and win. Populism is the future!

  54. It's time to get rid of political parties, all politicians are supposed to be independent!

  55. she's the epitome of why Dems lost in 2016 and lost 2020 already and yes I was a registered Democrat . WTF ? good jobs? , she just send away
    25000 6 figure Amazon jobs packin" , !!!! UNBELIEVABLE !!!!!

  56. Heh…Usually, Chuck is a real butt-hole when interviewing Progressives, so, I'm surprised to see that he behaved himself with A.O.C. Maybe he's starting to get a slightly better feel for which way the wind is blowing. Nah, I very much doubt that he could ever really stop being a paid corporate toady.

  57. Total loser. Trump will destroy her in debate, as witnessed when Homan shut her down. This woman doesn't even understand the term "Illegal"

  58. Great interview with AOC, regarding issues of the environment, healthcare, identity & class – – much, much more! Onward OAC! / Adelánte AOC!

  59. You mean redistribution of wealth on steroids!A designable offense ? Denying humanitarian aid at border? Deny food, deny beds, deny blankets? She did this! Can you say hypocritical, racist? STUPID???

  60. Honestly, can Chuck Todd ever let a guest finish their statements before he cuts in with a counter or a new question? How hard can it be to keep your mouth shut until your guest finishes answering your question??

  61. First impression. I don't know what is more sad. The brain dead horse pretending to have a brain or the person giving credit to a dead horse for being alive if it gives him ratings.

    Second Impression. I might not test to be African, but that doesn't make my hair any less nappy. So I would really like to know what the purpose is of this nut job telling me she's a descendant of Africans, Natives, and Spaniards when literally I am Creole and that is the race of my family (Native Cree being 200 years ago or so and now more than likely Chippewa or Cherokee following two upheavals in two countries.) This girl is nuts.

  62. AHH the Socialist who didn't even know what a garbage disposal was and what u put in a garbage disposal yah that Lying Corrupt Socialist trying to push COMMUNISM AND SOCIALISM IN AMERICA that America REJECTS and we are not going to be like China .NO THANKS AND U DEMOCRATS WILL NEVER BE IN POWER EVER AGAIN SHORTLY JUST LIKE Q AND TRUMP SAID.enjoy the show Lying Clowns

  63. Why has College tuition been raised so much more than the rate of inflation? Tuition reform. Tuition price CRISIS!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *